Discussion about this post

User's avatar
M. Marie Smith's avatar

Author's Comment — Update on the "Huckle Bearer" Fabrication

Since publishing this article, I’ve become aware of a site called H-O-M-E.org, which recycles the "huckle bearer" myth in an attempt to present it as historical fact.

After investigating both the site and its so-called author ("William Armstrong"), I conclude with high confidence that neither the article, nor the site, nor the supposed author are credible. H-O-M-E.org bears all the hallmarks of an AI-driven SEO content farm: unsourced assertions, robotic prose padded with typographical errors to simulate "human" writing, and a fabricated editorial staff whose biographies cannot be independently verified. "William Armstrong" appears to exist only within the confines of the site—no journalistic record, no academic presence, no professional footprint.

In short: the article is not research; it is algorithmic garbage dressed up for gullible consumption.

This misinformation does nothing to undermine the factual conclusions presented above. If anything, it underscores the urgency of exposing how cheaply historical myths are manufactured today.

Readers should treat H-O-M-E.org with the same seriousness they would afford an email from a Nigerian prince in 2003.

—M. Marie Smith

Expand full comment

No posts